Claim · model-written summary
Inoculant A caused more DM loss in the silage.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Whole crop forage sorghum (Saccharatum) cultivar FS5 was harvested at the soft dough stage of maturity”
e7“Silages treated with inoculant A possess the more DM loss, and the higher yeast counts upon aerobic exposure”
Title
Guan; Wu-tai; Ashbell; et al. 中国农业科学：英文版 2002
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Both inoculants caused a more rapid rate of pH decline than the control in sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Both inoculants produced a higher amount of lactic acid than the control in sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Both inoculants resulted in more glucose loss than the control.
- Intervention effect Both inoculants produced a little more CO2 than the control.
- Intervention effect Inoculant addition did not influence the ash and crude protein contents of the silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculants tended to decrease the concentration of acetic acid in sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculants tended to decrease the concentration of butyric acid in sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculants tended to decrease the concentration of propionic acid in sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculant A gave higher yeast counts upon aerobic exposure.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B gave the most DM in the silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B gave the highest lactic acid contents in the silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B gave the least acetic acid content in the silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B reduced ADF content in the silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B reduced ADL and NDF contents in the silage.
- Association Lactic bacteria inoculants may improve sorghum silage fermentation but impair aerobic stability.