Yield Gap 1 was 762.5 kg ha⁻¹.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Outcome: Yield Gap 1e0
Value: 762.5 kg ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“Yield Gap 1 of 762.5 kg ha⁻¹”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1077

Title

Enhancing soybean yields and profitability: A front line demonstration of the AISb-50 variety in Adilabad, northern Telangana

Dandu Mohan Das; M Raghuveer; G Shivacharan; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i8sc.1253

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation AISb-50 demonstration yield was 2125 kg ha⁻¹ in 2022-23.
Observation AISb-50 demonstration yield was 1850 kg ha⁻¹ in 2023-24.
Intervention effect Mean demonstration yield was 1987 kg ha⁻¹ versus 1629 kg ha⁻¹ in checks.
Observation Cultivation costs were similar between demonstration and check plots.
Intervention effect Demonstrations generated significantly higher gross and net returns.
Observation The demonstration benefit cost ratio was 2.41:1.
Observation Yield Gap 2 was 359 kg ha⁻¹.
Observation The technology index was 27.7%.

Record rev-4fc7e1663a234051b79355499c13d3e9b646b3a5395e1e6ba7842bd8e5bff7cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer