Claim · model-written summary
Bamboo culm diameter fell 37.30% toward the top.
- Taxon
- GIGANTOCHLOA APUS
Gigantochloa apust0 - Organ / stage
- top portione0
- Outcome
- culm diametere0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 37.30%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“culm diameter and wall thickness decreased significantly by 37.30% and 46.60%, respectively, toward the top portion”
t0“STRING BAMBOO (GIGANTOCHLOA APUS)”
Title
CHARACTERIZATION AND POTENTIAL UTILIZATION OF STRING BAMBOO (GIGANTOCHLOA APUS)
Oliver Marasigan; Shereyl A. Daguinod BIOTROPIA 2025. doi:10.11598/btb.2025.32.3.2506
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Bamboo culm wall thickness fell 46.60% toward the top.
- Observation Bamboo fiber length decreased 15.33% from bottom to top.
- Observation Bamboo fiber diameter decreased 13.86% from bottom to top.
- Observation Bamboo lumen diameter decreased 24.05% from bottom to top.
- Observation Bamboo cell wall thickness decreased 8.43% from bottom to top.
- Observation Derived fiber ratios varied significantly between bamboo nodes and internodes.
- Observation Nodes had higher cell wall fraction, Runkel ratio and Muhlsteph ratio than internodes.
- Observation Nodes had higher rigidity coefficient and Luce’s shape factor than internodes.
- Observation Radial shrinkage decreased 29.47% toward the bamboo culm top.
- Observation Volumetric shrinkage decreased 31.01% toward the bamboo culm top.
- Observation Shear strength decreased 47.20% toward the bamboo culm top.
- Observation Basic relative density, modulus of rupture and modulus of elasticity did not vary significantly along the culm.
- Observation Compression strength did not vary significantly along the bamboo culm.