Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tillage and spacing raised soybean productivity by 19.73%.

A claim from Plant Performance and Added Value of Soybean Farming by Tillage and Plant Spacing · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and spacing raised soybean productivity by 19.73%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillage and plant spacinge1
Outcome
soybean productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.73%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean productivity increased by 19.73%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–744
e1

“the soybean farming with tillage and plant spacing resulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–592

Title

Plant Performance and Added Value of Soybean Farming by Tillage and Plant Spacing

Joko Triastono; Chanifah; Arif Susila; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2022. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202236104006

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-50cd8a95fdd39cacb471ad11e6d4ddfc904a9e840d0bb1ac6e8a562562e3cb77 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 207 positive, 98 negative or no effect

206 papers in the same direction as this claim · 94 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Seeding rate did not change grain yield.

    Soybean agronomic performance in response to seeding rate and phosphate and potassium fertilization · 2018

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    High population or close spacing tended to reduce harvest index.

    Interception of Solar Radiation and Dry Matter Production by Various Soybean Planting Patterns1 · 1966

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Soybean yield was not affected by row spacing.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Narrow rows and high seeding rates had no yield effect for MG I and II.

    Potential of Early‐Maturing Soybean Cultivars in Late Plantings · 2000

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Increasing maize planting density reduced soybean seed yield by 21% and 23% at 44,440 and 53,330 plants/ha compared with 38,000 maize plants/ha.

    Effect of maize planting density on the performance of maize/soybean intercropping system in a guinea savannah agroecosystem · 2007 · compared with intercropping at 38,000 maize plants/ha

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Intra-row plant spacing did not significantly affect seed yields.

    Response of Soybean Cultivars to Planting Patterns1 · 1980

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Plant population within the studied range did not affect soybean yield.

    Influence of Rotation Sequence on the Optimum Corn and Soybean Plant Population · 2002

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Row spacing and seeding rate did not statistically affect seed yield.

    Response of Soybean Plant Types to Planting Patterns1 · 1969

    Opposite direction

296 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Plough tillage affected soybean yield more beneficially.

    Yield and Economic Effectiveness of Soybean Grown Under Different Cropping Systems · 2020

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    MT and NT tillage gave lower soybean income thresholds for zero profitability.

    Effect of Tillage System and Soil Conditioner Application on Soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merrill.) and Its Crop Management Economic Indicators · 2014

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    Soybean yields were similar under conventional and no tillage.

    Cover crop, tillage, and herbicide effects on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield · 2003 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    The seedbed tillage method and herbicide treatments did not significantly affect soybean yields in 1976.

    Seedbed Tillage and Herbicide Influence on Soybean (Glycine max) Weed Control and Yield · 1979

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Average no-till yields of soybean were similar to conventional tillage yields.

    Corn/Soybean Rotation Effect as Influenced by Tillage, Nitrogen, and Hybrid/Cultivar · 1991 · compared with CT

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Twenty-year mean soybean yield was reduced by 4 to 7% under chisel, ridge and no-till systems in both rotation and monoculture compared with plowing.

    Effect of Tillage and Rotation on Agronomic Performance of Corn and Soybean: Twenty‐Year Study on Dark Silty Clay Loam Soil · 1996 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Tillage systems did not significantly affect soybean yield in rotation.

    Tillage for Continuous Corn and Corn-Soybean Rotation · 1982

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Soybean yield was not affected by tillage systems under weed-free conditions.

    Influence of Tillage Systems on Annual Weed Densities and Control in Solid-seeded Soybean (Glycine max) · 1990

    Opposite direction

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.