Claim · model-written summary
The contribution of sulphur fractions to total S followed the order organic S > inorganic S > water soluble S > available S.
- Outcome
- contribution of different sulphur fractions to total Se2
- Qualifier
- organic S > inorganic S > water soluble S > available Se2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sulphur fractions in maize”
e2“The contribution of different sulphur fractions to total S was in the order of organic S > inorganic S > water soluble S > available S”
Title
Sandya Rani; B.G. Vasanthi; Mudalagiriyappa; et al. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2023. doi:10.5958/2231-6701.2023.00011.0
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Zincated bentonite sulphur at 12.5 kg/ha with RDF and FYM significantly increased available, water soluble and inorganic sulphur fractions.
- Observation A positive and significant correlation was observed among the sulphur fractions.
- Intervention effect Different sulphur sources did not significantly affect most soil properties.
- Intervention effect Zincated bentonite sulphur at 12.5 kg/ha with RDF and FYM gave the highest maize grain yield, 8235 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect Zincated bentonite sulphur at 12.5 kg/ha with RDF and FYM gave the highest maize stover yield, 10640 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect Zincated bentonite sulphur was much more effective for maize yield than conventional zinc sulphate alone.