Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer treatments had no great effect on Vicia faba Fe, Mn, and Zn content.

A claim from COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR USING ORGANIC MANURE AS INDIVIDUAL AND / OR MIXING IT WITH CHEMICAL FERTILIZER AND THEIR EFFECTS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF Vicia faba PLANTS; · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments had no great effect on Vicia faba Fe, Mn, and Zn content.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer as individually and/or as mixed with chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
Fe,Mn,Zne0
Direction
no great effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrional values expressed as the contant of protein.N,P ,K, Fe,Mn,Zn and Cu, the statistical analysis of the obtained data indicated no great effect of using nitrogen fertilizer as individually and/or as mixed with chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–902
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–152

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR USING ORGANIC MANURE AS INDIVIDUAL AND / OR MIXING IT WITH CHEMICAL FERTILIZER AND THEIR EFFECTS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF Vicia faba PLANTS;

Asmaa Mahmoud,; Magda Hafez; Faten Abd-Elal Journal of Plant Production 2004. doi:10.21608/jpp.2004.238582

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-511cadaeb0de25eaa7e28555cc20033df8f70fbb55530d4749831c91dc0eafe3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.