Claim · model-written summary
Refining and applying the equations requires production-condition testing and better understanding of temperature effects.
- Outcome
- testing under actual production conditions and a more complete understanding of temperature effectse0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The refinement and ultimate application of these equations, as superior predictors of field emergence, will require testing under actual production conditions and a more complete understanding of temperature effects, not accounted for in the formula used to compute growing‐degree units.”
t0“Maize”
Title
Predictive Equations for Maize Inbred Emergence1
R. J. Navratil; J. S. Burris Crop Science 1980. doi:10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183x002000050004x
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource Temperature-dependent emergence prediction equations were developed for 15 maize inbreds.
- Observation Regression slopes differed among maize inbreds.
- Association Growing-degree units to 50% emergence varied significantly among lots within maize inbred lines at the 0.01 level.
- Association Growing-degree units to 50% emergence varied significantly across maize field plantings at the 0.01 level.
- Association Field planting by inbred line interactions significantly affected growing-degree units to 50% emergence at the 0.01 level.
- Method / resource The predictive equations show promise in reducing subjective planting-rate decisions.