Mechanismmodel-written summary

The differential drought response of the two varieties may partly reflect underlying physiological differences that account for the greater drought resistance of Cheyenne.

A claim from Anatomical Variations in the Wheat Leaf Following Internal Water Stress · 1966

Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The differential drought response of the two varieties may partly reflect underlying physiological differences that account for the greater drought resistance of Cheyenne.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Cheyennee6
Outcome
drought resistancee6
Qualifier
underlying physiological differencese6

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second foliar leaves of Cheyenne, a drought-hardy, and Ponca, a drought-susceptible variety of winter wheat were compared anatomically before and after subjection to specific periods of moisture stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205
e6

“The differential response between the two varieties is attributed to underlying physiological differences which may in part account for the greater drought resistance in Cheyenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1478

Title

Anatomical Variations in the Wheat Leaf Following Internal Water Stress

Esther J. Ridley; Glenn W. Todd Botanical Gazette 1966. doi:10.1086/336370

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-53cdb472dcf2ece39df5e55652ca8e4f2d5cd6f918d1d4fd255b38462f592813 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer