Claim · model-written summary
Drum seeding gave a B:C ratio comparable to direct planting, 2.9.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae4 - Treatment
- drum seedinge0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
- Value
- 2.9e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Whereas, the drum seeding recorded less cost of cultivation (Rs 16,268) and comparable B: C ratio (2.9)”
e4“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”
Title
G. Satyanarayana Reddy; M. Sekhar; C. N. Chandrasekhar; et al. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 2013
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Direct planting reduced weed density and dry weight of weeds compared with drum seeding.
- Intervention effect Direct planting increased leaf area index, dry matter production and productive tillers compared with drum seeding.
- Intervention effect Direct planting gave 11% higher grain yield than drum seeding.
- Intervention effect Drum seeding recorded less cost of cultivation, Rs 16,268.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by cono weeding gave 86% weed control efficiency.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by cono weeding increased rice productivity and economics.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by cono weeding gave a B:C ratio of 3.4.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by motorized weeding gave a B:C ratio comparable to cono weeding, 3.3.