Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of crop establishment methods and weed management practices on productivity and economics of wet seeded rice

G. Satyanarayana Reddy; M. Sekhar; C. N. Chandrasekhar; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Wetland Farm of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during rabi 2009-2010 to study the effect of crop establishment methods and weed management practices on productivity and economics of drum seeding and direct planting system of rice. The direct planting system method of establishment proved better in terms of reducing weed density, dry weight of weeds and increased plant characters, viz., leaf area index, dry matter production, productive tillers and higher grain yield (11%) more compared to drum seeding method of establishment. Whereas, the drum seeding recorded less cost of cultivation (Rs 16,268) and comparable B: C ratio (2.9). Among weed management practices the pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DAS was very effective to realize higher weed control efficiency (86%), increased productivity and economics (BC ratio 3.4) and it was comparable with pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + motorized weeding on 45 DAS which recorded BC ratio (3.3).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct planting reduced weed density and dry weight of weeds compared with drum seeding.

Treatment
direct planting systeme1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weed density, dry weight of weedse1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
drum seeding method of establishmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The direct planting system method of establishment proved better in terms of reducing weed density, dry weight of weeds and increased plant characters, viz., leaf area index, dry matter production, productive tillers and higher grain yield (11%) more compared to drum seeding method of establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–582 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct planting increased leaf area index, dry matter production and productive tillers compared with drum seeding.

Treatment
direct planting systeme1
Outcome
leaf area index, dry matter production, productive tillerse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
drum seeding method of establishmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The direct planting system method of establishment proved better in terms of reducing weed density, dry weight of weeds and increased plant characters, viz., leaf area index, dry matter production, productive tillers and higher grain yield (11%) more compared to drum seeding method of establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–582 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct planting gave 11% higher grain yield than drum seeding.

Treatment
direct planting systeme1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
11%e1
Comparator
drum seeding method of establishmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The direct planting system method of establishment proved better in terms of reducing weed density, dry weight of weeds and increased plant characters, viz., leaf area index, dry matter production, productive tillers and higher grain yield (11%) more compared to drum seeding method of establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–582 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drum seeding recorded less cost of cultivation, Rs 16,268.

Treatment
drum seedinge0
Outcome
cost of cultivatione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
Rs 16,268e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas, the drum seeding recorded less cost of cultivation (Rs 16,268) and comparable B: C ratio (2.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–687 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drum seeding gave a B:C ratio comparable to direct planting, 2.9.

Treatment
drum seedinge0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Value
2.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas, the drum seeding recorded less cost of cultivation (Rs 16,268) and comparable B: C ratio (2.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–687 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by cono weeding gave 86% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DASe2
Outcome
weed control efficiencye2
Direction
highere2
Value
86%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DAS was very effective to realize higher weed control efficiency (86%), increased productivity and economics (BC ratio 3.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–958 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by cono weeding increased rice productivity and economics.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DASe2
Outcome
productivity and economicse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DAS was very effective to realize higher weed control efficiency (86%), increased productivity and economics (BC ratio 3.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–958 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by cono weeding gave a B:C ratio of 3.4.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DASe2
Outcome
BC ratioe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
3.4e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DAS was very effective to realize higher weed control efficiency (86%), increased productivity and economics (BC ratio 3.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–958 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pretilachlor + safener followed by motorized weeding gave a B:C ratio comparable to cono weeding, 3.3.

Treatment
pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + motorized weeding on 45 DASe3
Outcome
BC ratioe3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Value
3.3e3
Comparator
pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DASe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DAS was very effective to realize higher weed control efficiency (86%), increased productivity and economics (BC ratio 3.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–958 · show in text ↑
e3

“it was comparable with pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + motorized weeding on 45 DAS which recorded BC ratio (3.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1105 · show in text ↑
e4

“drum seeding and direct planting system of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–281 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.