Claim · model-written summary
The second season showed no significant response to nitrogen.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- nitrogene0
- Outcome
- response to nitrogene0
- Direction
- no significant responsee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“In the second season, no significant response to nitrogen was observed.”
t0“sweet potato”
Title
Integrated nutrient management research on sweet potato at Hobu, Morobe Province
Alfred E. Hartemink; S. Poloma; Jane O’Sullivan http://www.alfredhartemink.nl/PDF/2001 - INM PNG.pdf 2001
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Sweet potato yield was lowest after gliricidia.
- Intervention effect Yield did not differ after piper versus imperata.
- Intervention effect The second season showed no significant yield difference among preceding-plant plots.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased first-season tuber yield.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer depressed tuber yield in the second and third seasons.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased vine yields in all three seasons.
- Intervention effect Potassium fertilizer had no effect on marketable tuber yield.
- Intervention effect Potassium fertilizer increased nonmarketable tuber yield.
- Intervention effect Inorganic fertilizer and poultry litter gave no different yield response.
- Intervention effect The highest yields occurred at 100 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare.