Paper · 2001 · http://www.alfredhartemink.nl/PDF/2001 - INM PNG.pdf

Integrated nutrient management research on sweet potato at Hobu, Morobe Province

Alfred E. Hartemink; S. Poloma; Jane O’Sullivan

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on sweet potato tuber yield, we carried out a series of experiments at Hobu, Morobe Province, PNG. In the first experiment, plots were planted with Piper aduncum, Gliricidia sepium and Imperata cylindrica. After one year, these plants were slashed and sweet potato was planted. Sweet potato yield was lowest in plots with previous gliricidia, but there were no differences in yield between previous piper and imperata. In the second season, there was no significant difference in sweet potato yields between the plots. The second experiment consisted of a factorial fertiliser trial with four levels of nitrogen (0, 50, 100 or 150 kilograms per hectare) and two levels of potassium (0 or 50 kilograms per hectare). Nitrogen fertilisers increased tuber yield in the first season, but depressed tuber yields in the second and third seasons. Nitrogen fertiliser significantly increased vine yields in all three seasons. Potassium fertiliser had no effect on marketable tuber yield, but increased nonmarketable tuber yields. The third experiment compared nitrogen provided by inorganic fertiliser or by poultry litter at four rates (0, 50, 100 or 150 kilograms per hectare). No difference was found between the inorganic fertiliser and poultry litter, and highest yields were found at 100 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare. In the second season, no significant response to nitrogen was observed. This research indicates that sweet potato yield can be significantly

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato yield was lowest after gliricidia.

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
previous gliricidiae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato yield was lowest in plots with previous gliricidia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ after piper versus imperata.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
previous pipere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
imperatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no differences in yield between previous piper and imperata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The second season showed no significant yield difference among preceding-plant plots.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
plotse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second season, there was no significant difference in sweet potato yields between the plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased first-season tuber yield.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertiliserse0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilisers increased tuber yield in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer depressed tuber yield in the second and third seasons.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertiliserse0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
second and third seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilisers increased tuber yield in the first season, but depressed tuber yields in the second and third seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased vine yields in all three seasons.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilisere0
Outcome
vine yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all three seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertiliser significantly increased vine yields in all three seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilizer had no effect on marketable tuber yield.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Potassium fertilisere0
Outcome
marketable tuber yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertiliser had no effect on marketable tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilizer increased nonmarketable tuber yield.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Potassium fertilisere0
Outcome
nonmarketable tuber yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertiliser had no effect on marketable tuber yield, but increased nonmarketable tuber yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer and poultry litter gave no different yield response.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
inorganic fertilisere0
Outcome
No differencee0
Direction
No differencee0
Comparator
poultry littere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No difference was found between the inorganic fertiliser and poultry litter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yields occurred at 100 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
100 kilograms of nitrogen per hectaree0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yields were found at 100 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The second season showed no significant response to nitrogen.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
response to nitrogene0
Direction
no significant responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second season, no significant response to nitrogen was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.