Claim · model-written summary
Tolerant varieties had minimal 6.8% leaf area reduction at harvest.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The reduction in leaf area at the harvest stage was also minimal (6.8%) in the tolerant varieties.”
t0“Sorghum”
Title
Productivity of Rainfed Sorghum — A Physiological Analysis
D. Durga Devi; K. M. Sundaram; N. Natarajaratnam Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1987.tb00115.x
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Observation TNS 24, CO 19 and TNS 27 were drought tolerant.
- Observation K 3, CO 20 and CO 24 were drought susceptible.
- Observation Tolerant varieties had highest leaf area and higher LAD and CGR.
- Observation Tolerant varieties had higher LAD and CGR.
- Observation Tolerant varieties accumulated more dry matter.
- Mechanism Increased dry matter accumulation mainly explained yield improvement.
- Association Harvest index was not related to yield.