Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fluridone treatment severely inhibited the root elongation rate of maize at low water potential.

A claim from Effect of Inhibition of Abscisic Acid Accumulation on the Spatial Distribution of Elongation in the Primary Root and Mesocotyl of Maize at Low Water Potentials · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone treatment severely inhibited the root elongation rate of maize at low water potential.

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Material
FR27 x FRMo 17e0
Organ / stage
roote3
Treatment
fluridone treatmente3
Outcome
root elongation ratee3
Direction
severe inhibitione3

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (Zea mays L. cv FR27 x FRMo 17)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–406
e3

“The fluridone treatment was associated with severe inhibition of root elongation rate, which resulted from further shortening of the growing zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1066

Title

Effect of Inhibition of Abscisic Acid Accumulation on the Spatial Distribution of Elongation in the Primary Root and Mesocotyl of Maize at Low Water Potentials

I. N. Saab; R. E. Sharp; J. Pritchard PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1992. doi:10.1104/pp.99.1.26

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-56050ebaefd07ca82be7b067e8ef43c9f9ecf13f030fe75bea5abda7f88374c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Fluridone · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.