Claim · model-written summary
Cutting reduced erosion control by 20%.
- Taxon
- sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)
Sorghum bicolore1 - Treatment
- cuttinge0
- Outcome
- erosion controle0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 20%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cutting reduced erosion control by 20%, forage quantity by 50%, soil fertility by 40% and multifunctionality by 20%”
e1“the grass sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) alone (Grass cover) or together with the legume serradella (Ornithopus sativus) (Mixed cover)”
Title
Rosado J; Mandrini I; Muggia L; et al. ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) 2025
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Mixed cover did not improve ecosystem services except forage quality.
- Intervention effect Mixed cover improved forage quality by 30%.
- Intervention effect Cutting reduced forage quantity by 50%.
- Intervention effect Cutting reduced soil fertility by 40%.
- Intervention effect Cutting reduced multifunctionality by 20%.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress decreased carbon sequestration by 40%.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress decreased forage quantity by 30%.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress decreased soil fertility by 10%.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress decreased multifunctionality by 10%.
- Intervention effect Water stress caused complete serradella mortality.
- Intervention effect Combined stressors yielded the lowest service provision.
- Intervention effect Cutting improved forage quality by 40%.
- Intervention effect Severe water stress improved forage quality by 60%.
- Observation The authors interpret grass-dominated systems as more resilient to multiple stressors.