Mechanismmodel-written summary

Weed-free treatment had considerably lower additional returns because it was costly.

A claim from Effect of integrated weed-management practices on yield and economics of babycorn (Zea mays) · 2002

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment had considerably lower additional returns because it was costly.

Taxon
babycorn (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
weed-free treatmente0
Outcome
additional returnse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
very high cost involved in treatment applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite highest yield, weed-free treatment recorded considerably lower additional returns due to very high cost involved in treatment application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1826
t0

“babycorn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–92

Title

Effect of integrated weed-management practices on yield and economics of babycorn (Zea mays)

A. K. Pandey; Ved Prakash; H. S. Gupta The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2002

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-5791bc5d0fbb937e012dca5f3da3e69491664f7205035374490625535fafd9cc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer