Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lower-rate pre-emergence herbicides plus hand weeding gave yields comparable to weed-free treatment.

A claim from Effect of integrated weed-management practices on yield and economics of babycorn (Zea mays) · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower-rate pre-emergence herbicides plus hand weeding gave yields comparable to weed-free treatment.

Treatment
pre-emergence herbicides at lower levels applied in combination with hand-weeding 30 days after sowinge1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
weed-free treatmente2

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“pre-emergence herbicides at lower levels applied in combination with hand-weeding 30 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1186
e1

“followed by comparable yields recorded under hand-weeding 15 days after sowing integrated with earthing up, pre-emergence herbicides at lower levels applied in combination with hand-weeding 30 days after sowing, and pendimethalin @ 1.50 kg/ha and alachlor @ 2.00 kg/ha alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1250
e2

“were recorded under weed-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–974

Title

Effect of integrated weed-management practices on yield and economics of babycorn (Zea mays)

A. K. Pandey; Ved Prakash; H. S. Gupta The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2002

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-78752ee8d8cfa372627a16b32853fa6c38a5f125201fa9fc5ff04c073f8e8be7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.