Paper · 2016 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Growth, development and yield as affected by planting pattern and weed management in field pea and baby corn intercropping system

Moirangthem Thoithoi Devi*1; V.K. Singh

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive seasons of rabi 2011-13 at Dr. Norman E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre of G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar to find out the effect of planting pattern and weed management practices on growth, development and yield of field pea and baby corn in field pea (Pant P-13) + baby corn (Surya) intercropping system. The experiment was laid out in split plot design keeping four planting patterns as main plot and four weed management practices as sub plot with three replications. Most of the growth parameters viz. number of branches per plant, dry matter accumulation (g/plant), crop growth rate and relative growth rate of field pea were comparatively higher under sole planting of field pea as compared to intercropping systems. Sole planting of field pea recorded significantly higher grain (2264 and 1434 kg ha-1) and straw yields (3263 and 2540 kg ha-1) during 2011-12 and 2012-2013 than yield obtained as a component crop in paired planting of maize (30/60 cm) + field pea (2:2) and planting of maize + field pea (1:1). Baby corn yield was similar in sole, paired (2:2) and 1:1 planting but significantly higher stover yield of baby corn (3576 kg ha-1 and 3533 kg ha-1, during 2011-12 and 2012-2013 respectively) was obtained from sole crop than other planting methods during both the years. Hand weeding at 30 days after sowing, pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 and post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved all the growth and yield parameters of field pea and baby corn than weedy check .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole field pea had higher branch number, dry matter, and growth rates than intercrops.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
sole planting of field peae0
Outcome
number of branches per plant, dry matter accumulation (g/plant), crop growth rate and relative growth ratee0
Direction
comparatively highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the growth parameters viz. number of branches per plant, dry matter accumulation (g/plant), crop growth rate and relative growth rate of field pea were comparatively higher under sole planting of field pea as compared to intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole field pea had higher grain yield than the two maize intercrops, at 2264 and 1434 kg ha-1 in consecutive seasons.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Sole planting of field peae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
2264 and 1434 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
paired planting of maize (30/60 cm) + field pea (2:2) and planting of maize + field pea (1:1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Sole planting of field pea recorded significantly higher grain (2264 and 1434 kg ha-1) and straw yields (3263 and 2540 kg ha-1) during 2011-12 and 2012-2013 than yield obtained as a component crop in paired planting of maize (30/60 cm) + field pea (2:2) and planting of maize + field pea (1:1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole field pea had higher straw yield than the two maize intercrops, at 3263 and 2540 kg ha-1.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Sole planting of field peae0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
3263 and 2540 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
paired planting of maize (30/60 cm) + field pea (2:2) and planting of maize + field pea (1:1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Sole planting of field pea recorded significantly higher grain (2264 and 1434 kg ha-1) and straw yields (3263 and 2540 kg ha-1) during 2011-12 and 2012-2013 than yield obtained as a component crop in paired planting of maize (30/60 cm) + field pea (2:2) and planting of maize + field pea (1:1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baby corn yield was similar across sole, paired, and 1:1 planting.

Taxon
Baby corne0
Treatment
sole, paired (2:2) and 1:1 plantinge0
Outcome
Baby corn yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sole, paired (2:2) and 1:1 plantinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Baby corn yield was similar in sole, paired (2:2) and 1:1 planting but significantly higher stover yield of baby corn (3576 kg ha-1 and 3533 kg ha-1, during 2011-12 and 2012-2013 respectively) was obtained from sole crop than other planting methods during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole baby corn had significantly higher stover yield than other planting methods in both seasons.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
3576 kg ha-1 and 3533 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other planting methodse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Baby corn yield was similar in sole, paired (2:2) and 1:1 planting but significantly higher stover yield of baby corn (3576 kg ha-1 and 3533 kg ha-1, during 2011-12 and 2012-2013 respectively) was obtained from sole crop than other planting methods during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 30 days after sowing improved growth and yield of field pea and baby corn over a weedy check.

Taxon
field pea and baby corne0
Treatment
Hand weeding at 30 days after sowinge0
Interactor
weedye0weed
Outcome
all the growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding at 30 days after sowing, pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 and post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved all the growth and yield parameters of field pea and baby corn than weedy check .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 improved growth and yield of field pea and baby corn over a weedy check.

Taxon
field pea and baby corne0
Treatment
pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
weedye0weed
Outcome
all the growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding at 30 days after sowing, pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 and post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved all the growth and yield parameters of field pea and baby corn than weedy check .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved growth and yield of field pea and baby corn over a weedy check.

Taxon
field pea and baby corne0
Treatment
post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowinge0
Interactor
weedye0weed
Outcome
all the growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding at 30 days after sowing, pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 and post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved all the growth and yield parameters of field pea and baby corn than weedy check .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1633 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.