Intervention effectmodel-written summary

post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved growth and yield of field pea and baby corn over a weedy check.

A claim from Growth, development and yield as affected by planting pattern and weed management in field pea and baby corn intercropping system · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved growth and yield of field pea and baby corn over a weedy check.

Taxon
field pea and baby corne0
Treatment
post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowinge0
Interactor
weedye0weed
Outcome
all the growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding at 30 days after sowing, pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 and post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved all the growth and yield parameters of field pea and baby corn than weedy check .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1633

Title

Growth, development and yield as affected by planting pattern and weed management in field pea and baby corn intercropping system

Moirangthem Thoithoi Devi*1; V.K. Singh Legume Research - An International Journal 2016. doi:10.18805/lr.v0iof.11039

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-71f15dfd7fba25177f5fe4a10965a2b98482175f68d26cb08e2f34f15b8e0e09 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Imazethapyr · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Yields of pea and snap bean were not reduced by imazethapyr, except for snap bean after postemergence applications.

    Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and Rotational Crop Response to Imazethapyr in Pea (Pisum sativum) and Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) · 1990

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Combined imazethapyr seed treatment and late imazapyr increased pea biomass and seed yield relative to infested untreated plants.

    Broomrape (Orobanche crenata) Control with Imazethapyr Applied to Pea (Pisum sativum) Seed · 1996 · compared with broomrape-infested nontreated control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Imazethapyr increased mean seed yield of field pea by 24% in 1988 and 89% in 1989 over the check.

    Performance of Imazethapyr on Pulse Crops · 1990 · compared with the check

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Imazethapyr at 75g ha−1 gave higher pods per plant, seeds per pod and pod filling than other herbicidal treatments and the unweedy check.

    Effect of pre and post emergence herbicides on weeds and seed yield of garden pea · 2015 · compared with other herbicidal treatments and unweedy check

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Weed control raised field pea equivalent yield.

    Productivity and economics of field pea (Pisum sativum) and baby corn (Zea mays) intercropping systems as affected by planting pattern and weed management · 2018 · compared with weedy check

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Early post-emergence imazethapyr at 80 g ha-1 controlled weeds effectively and gave the highest green pea yield and economic returns.

    Imazethapyr and its Ready-mix Combinations for Weed Control in Pea under Palam Valley Conditions of Himachal Pradesh · 2019 · compared with pre-emergence pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 800 or 900 g ha-1

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Imazethapyr improved crop growth and yield parameters versus weedy check.

    Effect of Planting Pattern and Weed Management Practices on Weeds and Yields of Field Pea and Baby Corn in Field Pea + Baby Corn Intercropping System · 2019 · compared with weedy check

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Post-emergence imazethapyr improved field pea and baby corn yields relative to the weedy check.

    Composition of weeds and yield as affected by different weed management and planting patterns in field pea and baby corn intercropping system · 2015 · compared with weedy check

    Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Imazethapyr in Hoytville clay caused no significant corn yield reduction.

    Effect of Soil Type and pH on Persistence and Carryover of Imidazolinone Herbicides · 1993

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Corn yield was equivalent across imazethapyr plus imazapyr rates, between 10,200 and 11,500 kg/ha.

    Corn and Rice Response to Simulated Drift of Imazethapyr Plus Imazapyr · 2006

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Previous year imazethapyr at 310 g/ha reduced corn yield.

    Soybean (Glycine max) and Rotational Crop Response to PPI Chlorimuron, Clomazone, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr · 1994

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Neither imazaquin nor imazethapyr residues reduced corn height or grain yield under the tested systems.

    Effect of Tillage and Application Method on Corn (Zea mays) Response to Imidazolinone Residues in Soil · 1998

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Previous-year imazethapyr at 140 g/ha reduced Green Giant 97 ear yield.

    Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Hybrids Respond Differently to Simulated Imazethapyr Carryover · 1997

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    The F 1 hybrid grain yield was not reduced by 280 g/ha imazethapyr.

    Methods of Measuring the Impact of the XA17 Gene on Imazethapyr Injury in Corn (Zea mays) · 1995

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Adding CGA-248757 or flumiclorac to the partner herbicides did not reduce corn or soybean yields in field studies.

    Broadleaf Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) with CGA-248757 and Flumiclorac Alone and in Tank Mixtures1 · 2001

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Imazethapyr at the 8- to 10-leaf stage caused total corn yield loss regardless of NA.

    Reducing Imazethapyr Injury to Field Corn (Zea mays) with Naphthalic Anhydride · 1991

    Opposite direction

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.