Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Imazethapyr improved crop growth and yield parameters versus weedy check.

A claim from Effect of Planting Pattern and Weed Management Practices on Weeds and Yields of Field Pea and Baby Corn in Field Pea + Baby Corn Intercropping System · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr improved crop growth and yield parameters versus weedy check.

Taxon
field pea and baby corne0
Treatment
post-emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (30 days after sowing)e0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding, pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 and post-emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (30 days after sowing) improved all the growth and yield parameters of field pea and baby corn than weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2109–2344

Title

Effect of Planting Pattern and Weed Management Practices on Weeds and Yields of Field Pea and Baby Corn in Field Pea + Baby Corn Intercropping System

Moirangthem Thoithoi Devi; V. K. Singh International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.163

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-0f426db87f0a7ea9b828b08e48e118fda6ef72dee5e5e2ca0b6c1de677efc34e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

Imazethapyr · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.