Claim · model-written summary
Combined harrowing caused no observed yield loss in peas.
- Taxon
- peas
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- a combination of pre‐ and post‐emergence harrowinge1
- Outcome
- yield lossese0
- Direction
- no yield lossese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while no yield losses were observed in peas”
e1“a combination of pre‐ and post‐emergence harrowing”
Title
Effects of pre‐ and post‐emergence weed harrowing on annual weeds in peas and spring cereals
A LUNDKVIST Weed Research 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00718.x
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Combined pre- and post-emergence harrowing gave the best weed control.
- Intervention effect Combined harrowing caused 12–14% yield loss in spring cereals.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence harrowing alone or with early post-emergence harrowing was most effective against Sinapis arvensis.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence harrowing alone or with early post-emergence harrowing was most effective against Galeopsis spp.
- Intervention effect Post-emergence harrowing alone in peas had no effect on Sinapis arvensis.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence harrowing combined with one or two later treatments most effectively controlled Chenopodium album.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence harrowing combined with one or two later treatments most effectively controlled Polygonum lapathifolium.