Abstract
The economic and agronomic benefits of including annual grain legumes in cropping systems has resulted in a large increase in field pea production in Western Canada. Concerns have been raised about the large year-to-year variability in field pea grain yields and recent attention has focussed on weed management. A study was conducted to quantify the effects of time of post-emergence herbicide application to normal leafed and semi-leafless field pea types under natural weed populations and conservation tillage practices. Odyssey™ herbicide (50:50 imazethapyr:imazamox) was applied either 1, 2 or 3 wk after crop emergence with an untreated check included. The study was conducted at seven locations across the major agro-ecological zones of Saskatchewan in 1999 and 2000. The results of this study support the merits of early herbicide application 1 to 2 wk after crop emergence. Benefits of early time of weed removal occurred in 7 of 14 sites-years. There was no yield penalty recorded from early applications of herbicide, but some yield penalty was observed with later applications at certain locations. Spraying early rather than late minimizes the risks associated with delayed applications resulting from adverse weather conditions and a possible decrease in crop tolerance as was observed at the Swift Current site. Results support the early removal of weeds from field pea crops to optimize seed yield. Key words: Crop-weed interference, Pisum sativum L., weed management, timing of herbicide application
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Early weed removal conferred benefits at 7 of 14 site-years.
Verbatim
e0“Benefits of early time of weed removal occurred in 7 of 14 sites-years”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Early herbicide application produced no recorded yield penalty.
- Taxon
- field peat0
- Treatment
- early applications of herbicidee0
- Outcome
- yield penaltye0
- Direction
- no yield penaltye0
Not reportedInteractorComparator
Verbatim
e0“There was no yield penalty recorded from early applications of herbicide”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Later herbicide applications incurred some yield penalty at certain locations.
- Taxon
- field peat0
- Treatment
- later applicationse0
- Outcome
- yield penaltye0
- Direction
- penaltye0
- Qualifier
- certain locationse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“some yield penalty was observed with later applications at certain locations”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend removing weeds early to optimize field pea seed yield.
Verbatim
e0“Results support the early removal of weeds from field pea crops to optimize seed yield”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.