Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Imazethapyr increased field pea equivalent yield versus weedy check.

A claim from Effect of Planting Pattern and Weed Management Practices on Weeds and Yields of Field Pea and Baby Corn in Field Pea + Baby Corn Intercropping System · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: field peae0
Treatment: post-emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1e0
Outcome: field pea equivalent yielde0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“Hand weeding, pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha-1 and post-emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 had significantly higher field pea equivalent yield than weedy check.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2345–2537

Title

Effect of Planting Pattern and Weed Management Practices on Weeds and Yields of Field Pea and Baby Corn in Field Pea + Baby Corn Intercropping System

Moirangthem Thoithoi Devi; V. K. Singh International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.163

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Paired maize and field pea planting reduced total weed density and dry weight versus sole crops.
Intervention effect Paired maize and field pea planting raised weed control efficiency versus sole crops.
Intervention effect Sole field pea had significantly higher grain yield than field pea in either intercropping pattern.
Intervention effect Sole field pea had significantly higher straw yield than field pea in either intercropping pattern.
Intervention effect Baby corn yield was similar across sole and intercropped planting.
Intervention effect Sole baby corn had higher stover yield than other planting methods.
Intervention effect Both intercropping systems had higher field pea equivalent yield than either sole crop.
Intervention effect Hand weeding at 90 days yielded the lowest total weed density.
Intervention effect Hand weeding at 90 days yielded the lowest weed dry weight.
Intervention effect Hand weeding raised weed control efficiency compared with imazethapyr.
Intervention effect Pendimethalin raised weed control efficiency compared with imazethapyr.
Intervention effect Hand weeding improved crop growth and yield parameters versus weedy check.
Intervention effect Pendimethalin improved crop growth and yield parameters versus weedy check.
Intervention effect Imazethapyr improved crop growth and yield parameters versus weedy check.
Intervention effect Hand weeding increased field pea equivalent yield versus weedy check.
Intervention effect Pendimethalin increased field pea equivalent yield versus weedy check.

Record rev-b4fd63c63e7ac765783af29b320d67bd79a3bb094b7dcad8c3177b0695284067 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

Imazethapyr · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

no effect
Yields of pea and snap bean were not reduced by imazethapyr, except for snap bean after postemergence applications.
Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and Rotational Crop Response to Imazethapyr in Pea (Pisum sativum) and Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) · 1990
Opposite direction
positive
Combined imazethapyr seed treatment and late imazapyr increased pea biomass and seed yield relative to infested untreated plants.
Broomrape (Orobanche crenata) Control with Imazethapyr Applied to Pea (Pisum sativum) Seed · 1996 · compared with broomrape-infested nontreated control
Same direction
positive
Imazethapyr increased mean seed yield of field pea by 24% in 1988 and 89% in 1989 over the check.
Performance of Imazethapyr on Pulse Crops · 1990 · compared with the check
Same direction
positive
Imazethapyr at 75g ha−1 gave higher pods per plant, seeds per pod and pod filling than other herbicidal treatments and the unweedy check.
Effect of pre and post emergence herbicides on weeds and seed yield of garden pea · 2015 · compared with other herbicidal treatments and unweedy check
Same direction
positive
post emergence application of imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 30 days after sowing improved growth and yield of field pea and baby corn over a weedy check.
Growth, development and yield as affected by planting pattern and weed management in field pea and baby corn intercropping system · 2016 · compared with weedy check
Same direction
positive
Weed control raised field pea equivalent yield.
Productivity and economics of field pea (Pisum sativum) and baby corn (Zea mays) intercropping systems as affected by planting pattern and weed management · 2018 · compared with weedy check
Same direction
positive
Early post-emergence imazethapyr at 80 g ha-1 controlled weeds effectively and gave the highest green pea yield and economic returns.
Imazethapyr and its Ready-mix Combinations for Weed Control in Pea under Palam Valley Conditions of Himachal Pradesh · 2019 · compared with pre-emergence pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 800 or 900 g ha-1
Same direction
positive
Post-emergence imazethapyr improved field pea and baby corn yields relative to the weedy check.
Composition of weeds and yield as affected by different weed management and planting patterns in field pea and baby corn intercropping system · 2015 · compared with weedy check
Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

no effect
Combined harrowing caused no observed yield loss in peas.
Effects of pre‐ and post‐emergence weed harrowing on annual weeds in peas and spring cereals · 2009
Opposite direction
negative
Pre-emergence herbicides decreased pea seed yield.
Effects of herbicides on nodulation, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum) · 1999
Opposite direction
no effect
Herbicide treatments did not reduce pea biomass or seed yield.
Effects of Imazethapyr and Pendimethalin on Lentil (Lens culinaris), Pea (Pisum sativum), and a Subsequent Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Crop¹ · 2001 · compared with untreated control
Opposite direction
no effect
Cyanazine and linuron did not affect pea pod number, grains per pod, grain weight or grain yield.
Assessment of dimethoate toxicity on compost worm (Eisenia andrei) using earthworm avoidance test. · 2007
Opposite direction
negative
Herbicide treatments decreased vegetative weight and pea yield to different degrees.
Interaction between Nutrition and Herbicide Application in Pea Culture · 2009
Opposite direction
negative
Herbicides decreased pea seed yield.
Effect of weed management on weeds, and on the nodulation, nitrogenase activity, growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum) · 2006
Opposite direction
no effect
Pea seed yield was not affected by herbicide treatments at any location.
Response of Rotational Crops to BAY MKH 6561¹ · 2001
Opposite direction
no effect
Pre-emergence methabenzthiazuron gave yields comparable to two hand hoeings.
Efficiency of Different Herbicides for Weed Control in Peas · 1980 · compared with two hand hoeings
Opposite direction

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

Imazethapyr · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

herbicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ