Claim · model-written summary
Stimulation raised leaf strength in the bottom stem section.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Organ / stage
- bottom part of the steme0
- Treatment
- test groupe1
- Outcome
- strengthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the observed strength was lower in leaves collected from the top and central section of the stem but higher in the bottom part of the stem as compared to the control”
t0“alfalfa”
e1“In the test group, the observed strength was lower in leaves collected from the top and central section of the stem but higher in the bottom part of the stem as compared to the control.”
Title
Agata Dziwulska-Hunek; Mariusz Szymanek; Arkadiusz Matwijczuk; et al. Scientific Reports 2022. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20737-z
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Leaf tensile strength ranged from 1.59 to 2.45 N.
- Intervention effect Stimulation lowered leaf strength in top and central stem sections.
- Intervention effect L1 and F1 gave maximum increases in tearing force for top and bottom leaves.
- Intervention effect L5 produced the maximum decrease in tearing force in middle and top leaves.
- Intervention effect Stimulation decreased chlorophyll fluorescence lifetimes.
- Intervention effect Stimulation decreased photosynthetic pigment content.
- Intervention effect F1, L5 and L1 decreased fluorescence lifetimes.
- Intervention effect L1 laser stimulation decreased photosynthetic pigment content.