Claim · model-written summary
The authors consider the two BILs for further national and state-level trials.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Outcome
- considered for further trialse1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“drought tolerance in rice”
e1“These two BILS are therefore considered for further trials at the national and state levels”
Title
Suresh Ramalingam; Renuprasath Palanivel; Manju Devi Shanmugam; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2026. doi:10.1071/cp25134
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Sixteen rice BILs showed more than 10% yield gain under both moderate and severe stress.
- Observation BILs I85 and W61 showed higher relative water content, SPAD value and proline content.
- Observation BILs I85 and W61 showed better recovery under drought.
- Observation BIL I85 showed the best score for leaf rolling, leaf drying and drought recovery.
- Observation BIL I85 showed higher SPAD value and proline content.
- Observation BIL W61 showed higher values for SPAD, relative water content and proline content.
- Observation BIL W61 showed higher values for leaf drying score.
- Observation These two BILs had more than 10% higher single plant yield than the recurrent parent ADT (R) 45.