Intervention effectmodel-written summary

August seedlings after tillage 115 days earlier yielded more than sod or 62-day tillage seedlings.

A claim from CHARACTERIZATION OF SOD-INDUCED ALFALFA SEEDLING INJURY (ALLELOPATHY, ANAEROBIOSIS) · 1986

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August seedlings after tillage 115 days earlier yielded more than sod or 62-day tillage seedlings.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
tillage 115 days before seedinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sod or in sod tilled 62 days before seedinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings sown in August following tillage 115 days before seeding had higher yields than those sown in sod or in sod tilled 62 days before seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1010
t0

“ALFALFA SEEDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–48

Title

CHARACTERIZATION OF SOD-INDUCED ALFALFA SEEDLING INJURY (ALLELOPATHY, ANAEROBIOSIS)

David J. Lang University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) 1986

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-5842c1dcd1edf62d8944a4ab0776725167c84c6e507d77e8c1cbded8c6bd7407 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.