Claim · model-written summary
Yellow nutsedge was unaffected by cover-crop management timing.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- timing of cover-crop managemente0
- Interactor
- Yellow nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- Yellow nutsedgee0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yellow nutsedge was not influenced by cover-crop type or the timing of cover-crop management.”
t0“Soybean”
Title
S. B. Mirsky; W. S. Curran; D. M. Mortenseny; et al. Weed Science 2011. doi:10.1614/ws-d-10-00101.1
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Earlier fall cover-crop planting raised biomass about 2,000 kg ha −1.
- Intervention effect Each 10-day delay in spring termination raised cover-crop biomass about 2,000 kg ha −1.
- Method / resource A thermal model separating fall and spring heat units best estimated cereal rye biomass.
- Observation Cereal rye cultivars differed in total biomass accumulation.
- Observation Established cereal rye cultivars had similar growth rates.
- Observation Aroostook rye emerged earlier than Wheeler.
- Intervention effect Aroostook rye suppressed weeds more than Wheeler.
- Observation The rye-hairy vetch mixture had weed suppression intermediate between the two rye cultivars.
- Intervention effect Delaying cover-crop termination reduced weed density, especially early and late emerging summer annual weeds in 2006.
- Intervention effect Yellow nutsedge was unaffected by cover-crop type.
- Association Weed suppression depended on synchrony between weed emergence and accumulated cover-crop biomass.