Paper · 2011 · Weed Science

Timing of Cover-Crop Management Effects on Weed Suppression in No-Till Planted Soybean using a Roller-Crimper

S. B. Mirsky; W. S. Curran; D. M. Mortenseny; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
211
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Integrated weed management tactics are necessary to develop cropping systems that enhance soil quality using conservation tillage and reduced herbicide or organic weed management. In this study, we varied planting and termination date of two cereal rye cultivars (‘Aroostook’ and ‘Wheeler’) and a rye/hairy vetch mixture to evaluate cover-crop biomass production and subsequent weed suppression in no-till planted soybean. Cover crops were killed with a burn-down herbicide and roller-crimper and the weed-suppressive effects of the remaining mulch were studied. Cover-crop biomass increased approximately 2,000 kg ha −1 from latest to earliest fall planting dates (August 25–October 15) and for each 10-d incremental delay in spring termination date (May 1–June 1). Biomass accumulation for cereal rye was best estimated using a thermal-based model that separated the effects of fall and spring heat units. Cultivars differed in their total biomass accumulation; however, once established, their growth rates were similar, suggesting the difference was mainly due to the earlier emergence of Aroostook rye. The earlier emergence of Aroostook rye may have explained its greater weed suppression than Wheeler, whereas the rye/hairy vetch mixture was intermediate between the two rye cultivars. Delaying cover-crop termination reduced weed density, especially for early- and late-emerging summer annual weeds in 2006. Yellow nutsedge was not influenced by cover-crop type or the timing of cover-crop management. We found that the degree of synchrony between weed species emergence and accumulated cover-crop biomass played an important role in defining the extent of weed suppression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier fall cover-crop planting raised biomass about 2,000 kg ha −1.

Taxon
Cover-crope0
Treatment
earliest fall planting datese0
Outcome
Cover-crop biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2,000 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
lateste0

Verbatim

e0

“Cover-crop biomass increased approximately 2,000 kg ha −1 from latest to earliest fall planting dates (August 25–October 15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 10-day delay in spring termination raised cover-crop biomass about 2,000 kg ha −1.

Taxon
Cover-Cropt0
Treatment
10-d incremental delay in spring termination datee0e1
Outcome
Cover-crop biomasse0e1
Direction
increasede0e1
Value
2,000 kg ha −1e0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and for each 10-d incremental delay in spring termination date (May 1–June 1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cover-Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cover-crop biomass increased approximately 2,000 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–620 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A thermal model separating fall and spring heat units best estimated cereal rye biomass.

Taxon
cereal ryee0
Outcome
Biomass accumulatione0
Qualifier
thermal-based modele0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass accumulation for cereal rye was best estimated using a thermal-based model that separated the effects of fall and spring heat units.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cereal rye cultivars differed in total biomass accumulation.

Taxon
cereal ryee0e1
Outcome
total biomass accumulatione0e1

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars differed in their total biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cover-Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“two cereal rye cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Established cereal rye cultivars had similar growth rates.

Taxon
cereal ryee0e1
Outcome
growth ratese0e1
Qualifier
once establishede0e1

Verbatim

e0

“once established, their growth rates were similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cover-Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“two cereal rye cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aroostook rye emerged earlier than Wheeler.

Taxon
cereal ryee0e1
Material
Aroostooke0e1
Outcome
emergencee0e1
Direction
earliere0e1

Verbatim

e0

“earlier emergence of Aroostook rye.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cover-Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“two cereal rye cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aroostook rye suppressed weeds more than Wheeler.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
‘Aroostook’e0e1
Interactor
weede0e1weed
Outcome
weed suppressione0e1
Direction
greatere0e1
Comparator
Wheelere0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its greater weed suppression than Wheeler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Aroostook’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rye-hairy vetch mixture had weed suppression intermediate between the two rye cultivars.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
rye/hairy vetch mixturee0
Interactor
Weedt0weed
Outcome
intermediate between the two rye cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rye/hairy vetch mixture was intermediate between the two rye cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Suppression in No-Till Planted Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying cover-crop termination reduced weed density, especially early and late emerging summer annual weeds in 2006.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Delaying cover-crop terminatione0
Interactor
summer annual weedse0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying cover-crop termination reduced weed density, especially for early- and late-emerging summer annual weeds in 2006.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow nutsedge was unaffected by cover-crop type.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
cover-crop typee0
Interactor
Yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow nutsedge was not influenced by cover-crop type or the timing of cover-crop management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow nutsedge was unaffected by cover-crop management timing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
timing of cover-crop managemente0
Interactor
Yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow nutsedge was not influenced by cover-crop type or the timing of cover-crop management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed suppression depended on synchrony between weed emergence and accumulated cover-crop biomass.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
extent of weed suppressione0
Qualifier
degree of synchrony between weed species emergence and accumulated cover-crop biomasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the degree of synchrony between weed species emergence and accumulated cover-crop biomass played an important role in defining the extent of weed suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑

cover crop · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.