Paper · 2022 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Cereal rye cover crop terminated at crop planting reduces early‐season weed density and biomass in Wisconsin corn–soybean production

Kolby R. Grint; Nicholas J. Arneson; Maxwel Coura Oliveira; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract A fall‐established cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop has potential to provide weed suppression in fields that will be planted with corn ( Zea mays L.) and/or soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], reducing the selection pressure for herbicide resistance as part of an integrated weed management approach. However, biomass from an overwintering cover crop can be limited in areas with prolonged cool‐spring growing conditions, like in the Upper Midwest region of the United States. This study was conducted to determine if a cereal rye cover crop grown in Wisconsin and terminated at the time of crop planting could provide effective levels of early‐season weed suppression in corn–soybean systems practicing no‐till soil management. Cover crop biomass, weed biomass, and weed density were assessed at two Wisconsin locations (eight site‐crop‐years total; four site‐years of each corn and soybean) in 2019 and 2020. Cereal rye biomass production at the time of crop planting ranged from 290–1,480 kg ha –1 . Overall, no‐till management with a cover crop reduced weed density by 31% and reduced weed biomass by 61% compared with no‐till without a cover crop. These results indicate that the use of a cereal rye cover crop in the Upper Midwest has potential to reduce the exclusive reliance on spring burndown herbicides in no‐till, but limited spring cover crop biomass in this region may diminish the weed‐suppressive effects from this management practice compared with other parts of the United States where higher amounts of cover crop biomass can be achieved at crop planting time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cereal rye biomass at crop planting ranged from 290 to 1,480 kg ha –1.

Taxon
Cereal ryee0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Value
290–1,480 kg ha –1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Cereal rye biomass production at the time of crop planting ranged from 290–1,480 kg ha –1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A cereal rye cover crop reduced weed density by 31% compared with no cover crop in no-till corn and soybean.

Treatment
a cover crope0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
31%e0
Comparator
no‐till without a cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, no‐till management with a cover crop reduced weed density by 31% and reduced weed biomass by 61% compared with no‐till without a cover crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A cereal rye cover crop reduced weed biomass by 61% compared with no cover crop in no-till corn and soybean.

Treatment
a cover crope0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
61%e0
Comparator
no‐till without a cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, no‐till management with a cover crop reduced weed density by 31% and reduced weed biomass by 61% compared with no‐till without a cover crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–121 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that cereal rye cover cropping in the Upper Midwest may reduce reliance on spring burndown herbicides in no-till systems.

Treatment
a cereal rye cover crope0
Outcome
reduce the exclusive reliance on spring burndown herbicidese0
Setting
Upper Midweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of a cereal rye cover crop in the Upper Midwest has potential to reduce the exclusive reliance on spring burndown herbicides in no‐till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–121 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited spring cover crop biomass in this region may diminish weed suppression relative to regions with more biomass at planting.

Outcome
weed‐suppressive effectse0
Direction
diminishe0
Qualifier
limited spring cover crop biomasse0
Comparator
other parts of the United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limited spring cover crop biomass in this region may diminish the weed‐suppressive effects from this management practice compared with other parts of the United States where higher amounts of cover crop biomass can be achieved at crop planting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–121 · show in text ↑

cover crop · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

48 papers: 36 positive, 12 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

cover crop · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.