Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The weed-free condition gave the highest growth parameters in sorghum.

A claim from Effect of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Rabi Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor. L) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-free condition gave the highest growth parameters in sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
weed free conditione1
Outcome
growth parameters (plant height, dry matter production)e1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rabi Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor. L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103
e1

“weed free condition resulted to the highest growth parameters (plant height, dry matter production), yield attributing characters (number of ear heads per square meter, grains per ear head, ear head length, and 1000-grain weight), and maximum grain and stover yield (2830 & 6795 kg ha-1) due to higher weed control efficiency of 93.21%, reduced weed density (2.67 No. m-2) and weed dry matter (3.00 g. m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–810

Title

Effect of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Rabi Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor. L)

MSK. Mohammad Mansoor; B. Padmaja; G. S. Madhu Bindhu; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2024. doi:10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i113083

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-5b1dcd4faaa118bee1df6e052ab3dedbba9ad5bcb9b6f868c7966c6a028265b9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

37 papers: 27 positive, 10 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.