Claim · model-written summary
C. australis and var. glabrata had Celtis-type pollen, while var. tournefoertii had Ulmus-type pollen.
- Taxon
- C. australis
Celtis australise0 - Organ / stage
- pollen grainse0
- Outcome
- Celtis-type graine0
- Comparator
- var. tournefoertiie0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the pollen grains of C. australis together with var. glabrata belong to Celtis-type grain, while, var. tournefoertii to the Ulmus-type grain”
Title
Anatomical and Palynological Characters of Celtis L. In Kurdistan-Iraq
Saleem E. Shahbaz; Nazar M. Sharif Science Journal of University of Zakho 2017. doi:10.25271/2017.5.1.302
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation C. tournefortii lithocysts rarely made small leaf protrusions, whereas C. australis lithocysts made large protrusions.
- Observation C. tournefortii had a large midrib adaxial hump and wide leaf blade area, whereas C. australis had a small hump and narrow area.
- Observation C. australis stomata were anomocytic; C. tourneforti had anomocytic and paracytic stomata.
- Observation Simple hairs were dense on the petiole of C. tournefortii var. tournefortii and absent in var. glabrata.
- Observation Leaves of all studied Celtis taxa were bifacial and hypostomatic with one palisade layer.
- Observation Celtis pollen grains were three-porate and rarely four-porate, with a sunken area around a pore.
- Observation Pollen was medium sized and subprolate.
- Recommendation The authors interpret anatomical and pollen differences as supporting species rank for the two C. tournefoertii varieties.