Claim · model-written summary
Leaves of all studied Celtis taxa were bifacial and hypostomatic with one palisade layer.
- Organ / stage
- Leavese0
- Outcome
- bifacial, hypostomatic, and provided with one layer of palisade parenchymae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Leaves of all taxa are distinctly bifacial, hypostomatic, and provided with one layer of palisade parenchyma”
t0“Celtis”
Title
Anatomical and Palynological Characters of Celtis L. In Kurdistan-Iraq
Saleem E. Shahbaz; Nazar M. Sharif Science Journal of University of Zakho 2017. doi:10.25271/2017.5.1.302
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation C. tournefortii lithocysts rarely made small leaf protrusions, whereas C. australis lithocysts made large protrusions.
- Observation C. tournefortii had a large midrib adaxial hump and wide leaf blade area, whereas C. australis had a small hump and narrow area.
- Observation C. australis stomata were anomocytic; C. tourneforti had anomocytic and paracytic stomata.
- Observation Simple hairs were dense on the petiole of C. tournefortii var. tournefortii and absent in var. glabrata.
- Observation Celtis pollen grains were three-porate and rarely four-porate, with a sunken area around a pore.
- Observation Pollen was medium sized and subprolate.
- Observation C. australis and var. glabrata had Celtis-type pollen, while var. tournefoertii had Ulmus-type pollen.
- Recommendation The authors interpret anatomical and pollen differences as supporting species rank for the two C. tournefoertii varieties.