Claim · model-written summary
Farmer irrigation used 12%–20% more water than FI.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- FMe0
- Outcome
- irrigation watere0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 12%–20%e0
- Comparator
- FI treatmente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using 12%–20% more irrigation water than FI treatment, the FM”
t0“faba bean”
Title
Fathia El Mokh; Kamel Nagaz; Ashok Kumar Alva; et al. Irrigation and Drainage 2021. doi:10.1002/ird.2635
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Full irrigation had the lowest soil salinity at harvest.
- Intervention effect DI40 and farmer irrigation had the highest soil salinity at harvest.
- Intervention effect Full irrigation gave maximum faba bean yield.
- Intervention effect Farmer irrigation gave the lowest faba bean yield.
- Intervention effect DI70 did not significantly reduce yield relative to FI.
- Intervention effect DI40 significantly decreased fresh pod yield.
- Intervention effect Farmer irrigation significantly decreased fresh pod yield.
- Intervention effect Farmer irrigation did not improve soil salinity compared with FI.
- Intervention effect Farmer irrigation significantly reduced yield compared with FI.
- Observation Water productivity was 4.9 kg m−3 with farmer irrigation.
- Observation Water productivity was 14 kg m−3 with DI40.
- Intervention effect FI gave higher yield than farmer irrigation.
- Intervention effect FI gave higher net income than farmer irrigation.
- Intervention effect DI70 saved 30% of irrigation water.
- Recommendation The authors recommended DI70 where irrigation water is limited.