Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In peanut, dinoseb at 5.0 kg ai/ha at ground-cracking plus two cultivations gave net returns ($300/ha) equal to two cultivations plus two hoeings.

A claim from Efficiency of Chemical and Mechanical Methods for Controlling Weeds in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) · 1984

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In peanut, dinoseb at 5.0 kg ai/ha at ground-cracking plus two cultivations gave net returns ($300/ha) equal to two cultivations plus two hoeings.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
dinoseb (2- sec -butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) at 5.0 kg ai/ha applied at ground-crackinge0
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
equale1
Value
$300/hae0
Comparator
two cultivations plus two hoeing treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dinoseb (2- sec -butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) at 5.0 kg ai/ha applied at ground-cracking ($300/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–977
e1

“Herbicide(s) plus two cultivation treatments that had net returns equal to two cultivations plus two hoeing treatments were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–881
t0

“Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–97

Title

Efficiency of Chemical and Mechanical Methods for Controlling Weeds in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)

David C. Bridges; Robert H. Walker; John A. McGuire; et al. Weed Science 1984. doi:10.1017/s0043174500059609

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-5d6fbf117cdba3026ddbb1707298c96aab6be788341112067ef87c90027a353e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

dinoseb · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.