Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Herbicide sequences ending in five dinoseb applications substantially and consistently reduced yield, especially on Ruston soil.

A claim from Response of Florunner Peanuts to Planting Dates, Herbicide Sequences, and a Systemic Insecticide · 1977

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide sequences ending in five dinoseb applications substantially and consistently reduced yield, especially on Ruston soil.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner’Arachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
five repeated applications of dinosebe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Setting
Ruston soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Substantial and consistent yield reductions occurred when the herbicide sequences terminated with five repeated applications of dinoseb, especially on the Ruston soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–772
e1

“Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–428

Title

Response of Florunner Peanuts to Planting Dates, Herbicide Sequences, and a Systemic Insecticide

E.W. Hauser; G.A. Buchanan; W.L. Currey; et al. Weed Science 1977. doi:10.1017/s0043174500033312

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-d0ca2c627fe0a1899537111498bcf3e2f985c0c84d22d724f0fb9ade1919256b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

dinoseb · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.