Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Waterlogging reduced the uptake and transport of labelled P by cotton plants.

A claim from Impact of waterlogging on the nutrition of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) produced in sodic soils · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced the uptake and transport of labelled P by cotton plants.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume7
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
uptake and transport of labelled Pe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“waterlogging reduced root activity and reduced the uptake and transport of labelled P by the cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1717
e7

“the growth and nutrition of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–141

Title

Impact of waterlogging on the nutrition of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) produced in sodic soils

K. Dodd; C. N. Guppy; P. V. Lockwood; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2013. doi:10.1071/cp13093

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5e0ecfc8bad089940ca785e256f1590e846479d25643d0e9558caa41fadab9de · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

flooding · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.