Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertiliser application decreased alfalfa acid detergent fibre by 7.69% relative to non-fertiliser controls.

A claim from Fertilisation and environmental factors affect the yield and quality of alfalfa in China · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertiliser application decreased alfalfa acid detergent fibre by 7.69% relative to non-fertiliser controls.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
fertiliser applicatione2
Outcome
acid detergent fibree4
Direction
decreasinge4
Value
7.69%e4
Comparator
non-fertiliser control levelse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a superior-quality perennial legume forage crop cultivated in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99
e2

“compared to the non-fertiliser control levels, fertiliser application increased alfalfa yield by 24.61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–579
e4

“decreasing acid detergent fibre by 7.69% and neutral detergent fibre by 6.76%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–735

Title

Fertilisation and environmental factors affect the yield and quality of alfalfa in China

Shun Li; Zongqing Liu Plant Soil and Environment 2024. doi:10.17221/457/2023-pse

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5e2cf64e5a01d9f6622394d4bda02044a1e0f5fdbca6e9fbd79b2fb090ced063 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.