Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 0.5 g/L mixed IBA and NAA treatment was better than either hormone alone.

A claim from Effect of Plant Hormone on the Cutting and Rooting of Camellia chekiangoleosa · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5 g/L mixed IBA and NAA treatment was better than either hormone alone.

Taxon
Camellia chekiangoleosaCamellia chekiangoleosat0
Treatment
mixed plant hormone(80% IBA+20%NAA) treatment with concentration of 0.5 g/Le0
Outcome
optimale0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
NAA and IBA alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia chekiangoleosa
Camellia chekiangoleosa · TaxonKrzysztof Golik · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia chekiangoleosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–77
e0

“the optimal one was mixed plant hormone(80% IBA+20%NAA) treatment with concentration of 0.5 g/L,which was better than that of NAA and IBA alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–618

Title

Effect of Plant Hormone on the Cutting and Rooting of Camellia chekiangoleosa

Jin Xiqin 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-5eb596c6a070722dd9343ddf73c3ddffa7e7fb5a1511edcad51778026aa11731 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer