Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded root and top fresh weight and root length and root diameter.
- Taxon
- Sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- ammonium sulphatee1
- Outcome
- root and top fresh weight, root length, root diametere1
- Direction
- exceedede1
- Comparator
- ureae1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet Growth”
e1“Beet plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate as compared with urea significantly exceeded root and top fresh weight, root length, root diameter, leaf area index and total dry matter accumulation per plant as growth parameters, roots, top, gross sugar and white sugar as yield components, percentage of gross sugar, white sugar, quality index as quality parameters and NUE for yields of roots, gross sugar, white sugar and loss sugar in both seasons, and chlorophyll “a” in first season only”
Title
Hossam M. EL-Sharnoby Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2021. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2021.165933
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded leaf area index and total dry matter accumulation per plant.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded roots yield components.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded gross sugar and white sugar yield components.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded percentage of gross sugar, white sugar and quality index.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded NUE for yields of roots and gross sugar.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded NUE for white sugar and loss sugar yields in both seasons.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly exceeded chlorophyll a in the first season only.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly decreased concentrations of K, Na and alpha-amino-N impurities.
- Intervention effect Ammonium sulphate, compared with urea, significantly decreased loss sugar percentage in both seasons.
- Intervention effect The 120 kg N/fed. rate gave the highest photosynthetic contents, yield components and quality parameters.
- Intervention effect The 120 kg N/fed. rate gave the highest NUE for gross sugar and white sugar yields.
- Intervention effect The same 120 kg N/fed. rate gave the lowest values for all impurity parameters measured.
- Intervention effect The same 120 kg N/fed. rate gave the lowest loss sugar percentage and NUE for roots and loss sugar yields.
- Recommendation The authors recommend ammonium sulphate at 120 kg N/fed. for sugarbeet.
- Association The interaction of nitrogen source and rate was significant for root length and fresh weight per plant in the first season only.
- Association The interaction of nitrogen source and rate was significant for root diameter, chlorophyll b and gross sugar yield in the second season.
- Association The interaction of nitrogen source and rate was significant for all quality parameters and NUE for loss sugar yield in the second season.
- Association The interaction of nitrogen source and rate was significant for roots, top and white sugar yields per feddan in both seasons.
- Association The interaction of nitrogen source and rate was significant for all impurities and NUE for roots, gross sugar and white sugar yields in both seasons.