Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water deficit significantly altered groundnut leaf photosynthetic rate.

A claim from Effect of drought on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of groundnut genotypes · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly altered groundnut leaf photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
water deficit stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate in the leafe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of water deficit stress reduced PS II efficiency, which significantly altered the photosynthetic rate in the leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–920
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75

Title

Effect of drought on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of groundnut genotypes

K. Manojkumar; S. Vincent; M. Raveendran; et al. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2021. doi:10.31018/jans.v13i4.3145

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-5fcafaa8937add131ccb87854927c9bb59b9f2fda89fbd438aabf4b40341743a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 6 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Drought significantly reduced peanut stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and water use efficiency.

    Recovery Strategy Following the Imposition of Episodic Soil Moisture Deficit in Stands of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2002

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Water deficit tended to raise Rubisco content without significance.

    Variation in Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Its Relationship to Specific Leaf Area and Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Content in Groundnut Genotypes · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Water stress upregulated AhATL1 transcript and protein expression in peanut.

    Isolation of an ABA Transporter-Like 1 Gene from Arachis hypogaea That Affects ABA Import and Reduces ABA Sensitivity in Arabidopsis · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Calcium fertilizer under drought stress increased chlorophyll content, leaf photosynthetic rate and root vitality of peanut.

    [Effects of calcium fertilizer application on peanut growth, physiological characteristics, yield and quality under drought stress]. · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    C76-16 downregulated photosynthesis under mild drought at 25 days.

    Genotypic Differences in Photosynthetic Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in Peanut under Drought at the Onset of Flowering · 2024

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Nanosilicon under drought increased carotenoids, proline and photosynthetic pigments in genotype GJG-22 compared with GG-6.

    BIOCHEMICAL CHANGES INDUCED BY NANOSILICON IN MITIGATING DROUGHT STRESS IN GROUNDNUTS (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) · 2024 · compared with GG-6

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Root/shoot ratio, photosynthetic pigment content and specific leaf area of peanut increased gradually with extended drought stress.

    Adaptability of peanut genotypes under drought stress · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    At higher stress strength, PSII photosynthetic yield, quantum yield of PSII electron transport, and excitation energy capture efficiency were lower.

    Salt and osmotic stress-induced changes in physio-chemical responses, PSII photochemistry and chlorophyll a fluorescence in peanut · 2022

    Same direction

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.