Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The RDF and foliar treatment produced higher net returns (52,900 ha-1) than the other treatments, except the stated at-par treatment.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF FOLIAR NUTRITION ON PERFORMANCE OF BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO L.), NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS UNDER DRY LAND ECOSYSTEMS · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RDF and foliar treatment produced higher net returns (52,900 ha-1) than the other treatments, except the stated at-par treatment.

Taxon
BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO L.)Vigna mungot0
Treatment
RDF as a basal dose and foliar spray of 40ppm NAA + 0.5% chelated micronutrient + 2% DAPe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
52,900 ha-1e0
Qualifier
at par with RDF + foliar spray of 2% DAP + 0.5% chelated micronutriente0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result indicated that application of RDF as a basal dose and foliar spray of 40ppm NAA + 0.5% chelated micronutrient + 2% DAP given at 35 and 50 DAS recorded significantly higher growth components like plant height (37.11 cm), number of branches (8.27 plant-1), leaf area index (4.18), and total dry matter production (15.98 g plant-1) and also higher grain yield (1298 kg ha-1), net returns and B:C ratio ( 52,900 ha-1 and 3.03 respectively), over rest of the treatments but it was at par with RDF + foliar spray of 2% DAP + 0.5% chelated micronutrient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–749
t0

“BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–74

Title

INFLUENCE OF FOLIAR NUTRITION ON PERFORMANCE OF BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO L.), NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS UNDER DRY LAND ECOSYSTEMS

Shashikumar; R. Basavarajappa; S. R. Salakinkop; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2013

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-62704b72bd7e8f5db7105b58d6398a24a4d31df956fbda8efcc0ebf1902c2bda · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

199 papers: 197 positive, 2 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

190 papers more in this group

See all 199 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.