Claim · model-written summary
In Population 1, dominance effects explained 3% of variation in percent heat injury in 1981.
Glycine maxNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In Population 1, significant genetic variation among generations (56%) was attributed to the additive genetic effect for percent heat injury in 1980 and to the additive (96%) and dominance (3%) effects in 1981.”
t0“SOYBEAN”
Title
INHERITANCE OF CELLULAR MEMBRANE THERMOSTABILITY AND AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN TWO SOYBEAN POPULATIONS
George Michael Pollak Lincoln (University of Nebraska) 1983
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Additive genetic effects accounted for 99% of variation in percent heat injury in Population 2 in both years.
- Observation In Population 1, additive effects explained 56% of significant genetic variation in percent heat injury in 1980.
- Observation In Population 1, additive effects explained 96% of variation in percent heat injury in 1981.
- Observation Percent heat injury was quantitatively inherited in both soybean populations.
- Observation A major gene or genes appeared to influence percent heat injury in Population 1.
- Recommendation The authors proposed pure line or recurrent selection as effective for increasing membrane thermostability in these populations.
- Observation Early generation selection did not effectively decrease percent heat injury in Population 1.
- Observation Actual F(,2) plant selection in Population 2 produced a 5% mean gain toward decreased heat injury.
- Observation Predicted F(,3) family selection in Population 2 showed an 11% mean gain toward decreased heat injury.