Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pearl millet intercropped with mungbean at 1 : 7 row ratio gave maximum PMEY, LER and aggressivity.

A claim from Evaluation of pearl millet and mungbean intercropping systems in arid region of Rajasthan (India) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet intercropped with mungbean at 1 : 7 row ratio gave maximum PMEY, LER and aggressivity.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7e1
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0other
Outcome
pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivitye1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
sole and other intercropping treatmentse1
Setting
arid region of Rajasthane0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153
e1

“The intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7, followed by 2 : 6 and 1: 3 row ratio produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivity , net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratio and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–642

Title

Evaluation of pearl millet and mungbean intercropping systems in arid region of Rajasthan (India)

Kalu Ram; RS Meena Bangladesh Journal of Botany 2015. doi:10.3329/bjb.v43i3.21616

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-632ad6bd00a1c6203d840e8a13ef216dbbf300082d8ffabe7560ab5b67314a61 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Vigna radiata · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Two years of mung bean increased pearl millet grain yield by 37%.

    Cropping systems: Effects on soil quality indicators and yield of pearl millet in an arid region · 1997 · compared with continuous pearl millet

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Pearl millet sole and mungbean sole had the highest grain, straw and biological yields and pearl millet equivalent yield.

    Response of Pearl Millet and Mungbean Intercropping Under Custard Apple Orchard of Vindhyan Region · 2018 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Intercropping increased combined seed yield by up to 60% at Bambey relative to millet monocropping.

    Evaluating pearl millet and mungbean intercropping in the semi‐arid regions of Senegal · 2020 · compared with millet monocropping

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Pearl millet plus green gram had significantly more tillers, dry matter, earheads, and longer earheads, with higher grain and straw yields.

    Effect of Intercropping and Fertility Levels on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Summer Pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under South Gujarat Condition · 2021

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Mixed cropping yielded less than sole cropping under drought.

    Performance of pearl millet‐based intercropping systems under drought conditions · 1994 · compared with sole cropping

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Green and dry fodder yields of pearlmillet and clusterbean were substantially reduced under intercropping compared with sole crops.

    Fodder productivity and economics of multi-cut pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) intercropped with clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) · 2001 · compared with sole crop yields

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Intercropping reduced fodder yields of both component crops relative to sole stands.

    Fodder productivity and economics of pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) with legumes intercropping under various row proportions · 2001 · compared with their sole stands

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    In the second year Jatropha intercropping significantly reduced growth, yield and yield attributes of pearlmillet versus control.

    PERFORMANCE OF FORAGE AND LEGUMES INTERCROPPING IN JATROPHA CURCAS PLANTATION IN SEMI-ARID REGION OF HARYANA · 2012 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Intercropping Stylosanthes with millet did not significantly affect millet grain yield in the establishment year.

    Intercrop Stylosanthes effects on millet yields and animal performance in the Sahel · 1992

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Intercropped pearl millet yield was about 41% below sole crop yield on average.

    Sesame Sole Crop and Intercrop Response to Fertilizer in Semi‐Arid Niger · 2019 · compared with sole crop

    Opposite direction

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.