Paper · 2015 · Bangladesh Journal of Botany

Evaluation of pearl millet and mungbean intercropping systems in arid region of Rajasthan (India)

Kalu Ram; RS Meena

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
82
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif season, 2011 to evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan. The treatments comprised of sole pearl millet at 45 cm spacing, one sole mungbean and ten pearl millet with mungbean treatments row in different ratio. The intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7, followed by 2 : 6 and 1: 3 row ratio produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivity , net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratio and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments. Aggressivity values showed that inter crop mungbean did not offer any competition to pearl millet in different row ratio, while relative crowding coefficient (RCC) values indicated was a yield disadvantage in mungbean in all the intercropping system except 1: 7 row ratio. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v43i3.21616 Bangladesh J. Bot. 43(3): 367-370, 2014 (December)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet intercropped with mungbean at 1 : 7 row ratio gave maximum PMEY, LER and aggressivity.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7e1
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0other
Outcome
pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivitye1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
sole and other intercropping treatmentse1
Setting
arid region of Rajasthane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7, followed by 2 : 6 and 1: 3 row ratio produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivity , net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratio and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet intercropped with mungbean at 1 : 7 row ratio gave maximum net returns and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7e1
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0other
Outcome
net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
sole and other intercropping treatmentse1
Setting
arid region of Rajasthane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7, followed by 2 : 6 and 1: 3 row ratio produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivity , net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratio and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet intercropped with mungbean at 1 : 7 row ratio gave better nutrient uptake than sole and other intercropping.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7e1
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0other
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
sole and other intercropping treatmentse1
Setting
arid region of Rajasthane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7, followed by 2 : 6 and 1: 3 row ratio produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivity , net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratio and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet intercropped with mungbean at 2 : 6 row ratio ranked just behind the 1 : 7 ratio on PMEY, LER and aggressivity.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
2 : 6e1
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0other
Outcome
pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivitye1
Direction
followed bye1
Comparator
sole and other intercropping treatmentse1
Setting
arid region of Rajasthane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7, followed by 2 : 6 and 1: 3 row ratio produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivity , net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratio and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet intercropped with mungbean at 1 : 3 row ratio ranked behind the 1 : 7 and 2 : 6 ratios on PMEY, LER and aggressivity.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
1: 3e1
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0other
Outcome
pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivitye1
Direction
followed bye1
Comparator
sole and other intercropping treatmentse1
Setting
arid region of Rajasthane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The intercropping of pearl millet with mungbean in 1 : 7, followed by 2 : 6 and 1: 3 row ratio produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY), land equivalent ratio (LER), aggresivity , net returns,benefit cost (B : C) ratio and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean yield was disadvantaged in all pearl millet intercropping systems except the 1 : 7 row ratio.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae2
Treatment
all the intercropping systeme2
Interactor
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0other
Outcome
yield disadvantage in mungbeane2
Setting
arid region of Rajasthane0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“relative crowding coefficient (RCC) values indicated was a yield disadvantage in mungbean in all the intercropping system except 1: 7 row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean did not compete with pearl millet at any row ratio.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse3
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae3other
Outcome
competition to pearl millete3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet with mungbean in the arid region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“Aggressivity values showed that inter crop mungbean did not offer any competition to pearl millet in different row ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–764 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Vigna radiata · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.