Claim · model-written summary
Physical paddy loss after twelve months was 35.2% in woven polypropylene sacks.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“found to be 16.7,35.2 and 30.3% in jute, woven polypropylene and canvas sacks respectively at the end oftwelve month storage.”
e1“The physical loss of paddy”
t0“Physical Losses in Bagged Paddy Grain”
Title
Physical Losses in Bagged Paddy Grain in Open Environment
A. K. Thakur; A. K. Gupta Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 2008. doi:10.52151/jae2008452.1319
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Association Paddy grain moisture and temperature tracked ambient humidity and temperature.
- Intervention effect Rain raised paddy grain moisture to around 20% in every sack.
- Observation Woven polypropylene resisted moisture release and was associated with more paddy damage.
- Observation Jute allowed moisture exchange and less paddy damage.
- Observation Canvas had higher vapour transmission than jute.
- Observation Canvas obstructed air movement and reduced moisture transfer from paddy.
- Observation Physical paddy loss after twelve months was 16.7% in jute sacks.
- Observation Physical paddy loss after twelve months was 30.3% in canvas sacks.
- Observation Physical losses differed significantly from rice processing yield losses after six months.
- Observation Physical losses did not differ significantly from rice processing yield losses after twelve months.
- Observation Jute sacks had good storage ability for paddy grain in an open environment.