Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same residue treatment enhanced earhead and grain traits.

A claim from Effect of wheat residue management and fertilizer levels on growth, yield attributes and yield of summer pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] under north Gujarat condition · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same residue treatment enhanced earhead and grain traits.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
harvesting through combine harvester and straw incorporate in soil + decomposer fungal consortia (1 lit/t) + 25 kg N/hae0
Outcome
number of earhead, length of earhead, grains weight/earheade0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvesting through combine harvester and straw incorporate in soil + decomposer fungal consortia (1 lit/t) + 25 kg N/ha enhanced the growth parameters viz., plant height, number of tillers and likewise yield attributes viz., number of earhead, length of earhead, grains weight/earhead, test weight, grain yield and straw yield of pearl millet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–863

Title

Effect of wheat residue management and fertilizer levels on growth, yield attributes and yield of summer pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] under north Gujarat condition

Sweta A Patel; PP Chaudhary; Neha Chaudhary; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-64b2fa3a949de69dbb9e191d6ef6344ed7ce339320fc2b1fd96688d6c668c365 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.