Claim · model-written summary
No interaction was found between cluster thinning time and cane node length in grapevines
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mature ‘Vidal blanc’ and ‘Chardonnay’ (Vitis sp.) grapevines were cluster thinned at different times to determine the influence on vine growth and fruiting”
e5“There was no interaction between cluster thinning time and cane node length”
Title
Effect of Time of Cluster Thinning Grapevines
David C. Ferree; Garth A. Cahoon; David M. Scurlock; et al. Small Fruits Review 2003. doi:10.1300/j301v02n01_02
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Cluster thinning to one cluster per shoot decreased grapevine yield
- Intervention effect Cluster thinning to one cluster per shoot increased juice soluble solids concentrations in grapevines
- Intervention effect Clusters on longer canes (node length 12 nodes or more) had reduced cluster and berry weight
- Intervention effect Cane length had no effect on juice components of grapevines
- Intervention effect Later cluster thinning of Vidal blanc grapevines increased cluster weight and juice pH more
- Intervention effect Berry weight of grapevines was maximal when vines were cluster thinned two weeks after bloom
- Intervention effect Cluster thinning had no effect on pruning weight, shoot distribution or origin, or leaf mineral levels
- Intervention effect Juice total soluble solids of Vidal blanc increased equally at all cluster thinning times
- Intervention effect Juice total soluble solids of Chardonnay increased equally at all cluster thinning times