Claim · model-written summary
Compost did not alter maize physiological responses compared with mineral fertilizer.
- Treatment
- composte0
- Outcome
- maize physiological responsee0
- Direction
- did not altere0
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizere0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the addition of compost or biochar did not alter the maize physiological response compared to the addition of mineral fertilizer used under the same conditions”
Title
MICHELLE A. COELHO; ROBERTA FUSCONI; LILIANE PINHEIRO; et al. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2018. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201820170416
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Biochar did not alter maize physiological responses compared with mineral fertilizer.
- Observation Compost and biochar combined with urea and NBPT differed in maize nutritional responses.
- Intervention effect Biochar plus urea and NBPT yielded the greatest maize nitrogen concentration.
- Intervention effect Compost combined with urea and NBPT increased total maize nitrogen assimilation versus conventional fertilization.
- Intervention effect Biochar combined with urea and NBPT increased total maize nitrogen assimilation versus conventional fertilization.
- Intervention effect The authors conclude that urea and NBPT together improved maize nitrogen-use efficiency.