Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bagged cross-pollinated flowers set 43.8% fruit versus 6.6% for bagged self-pollinated flowers.

A claim from Insect flower visitors, foraging behaviour and their effectiveness as pollinators of Persoonia virgata R. Br. (Proteaceae) · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagged cross-pollinated flowers set 43.8% fruit versus 6.6% for bagged self-pollinated flowers.

Taxon
Persoonia virgataPersoonia virgatat0
Treatment
bagged and cross‐pollinatede0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
moree0
Value
43.8%e0
Qualifier
6.6%e0
Comparator
bagged and self‐pollinatede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persoonia virgata
Persoonia virgata · TaxonTatiana Gerus from Brisbane, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowers that were bagged and cross‐pollinated set significantly ( P < 0.001) more fruit (43.8%) than flowers that were bagged and self‐pollinated (6.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1029
t0

“Persoonia virgata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–102

Title

Insect flower visitors, foraging behaviour and their effectiveness as pollinators of Persoonia virgata R. Br. (Proteaceae)

Helen M Wallace; Glynn V Maynard; Stephen J Trueman Australian Journal of Entomology 2002. doi:10.1046/j.1440-6055.2002.00265.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-6927fa4bd7e60956aebc3cc6508ccec8631c9911f7dc9483a278add1a9775d06 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer