Recommendationmodel-written summary

The authors warn that infection comparisons lacking irrigation, delayed harvest, and maturity-matched standards may misclassify resistance.

A claim from Irrigation and Time of Harvest Effects on Evaluation of Selected Soybean Accessions Against Phomopsis longicolla · 2010

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors warn that infection comparisons lacking irrigation, delayed harvest, and maturity-matched standards may misclassify resistance.

Taxon
accessionse0
Interactor
P. longicollae0pathogen
Outcome
false conclusions about resistancee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“simple comparisons of percent seed infection among accessions without irrigation, without delayed harvest, and without a standard control of a similar maturity group might result in false conclusions about resistance to P. longicolla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–2025

Title

Irrigation and Time of Harvest Effects on Evaluation of Selected Soybean Accessions Against Phomopsis longicolla

A. Mengistu; J. R. Smith; N. Bellaloui; et al. Crop Science 2010. doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.11.0657

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-69a35e07ce71260e046c7f3f76a328c3d7b3fa5a97e95f38026e963381a6dfbe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer